<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1408 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364100</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the appeals on accrued expenses, following the precedent set in Jagdish Prasad Gupta v. CIT. The court ruled that the obligation to pay increased license fee to the Railways was an accrued liability in the payment year, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1408 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364100</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the appeals on accrued expenses, following the precedent set in Jagdish Prasad Gupta v. CIT. The court ruled that the obligation to pay increased license fee to the Railways was an accrued liability in the payment year, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>