https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364081 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the demand for service tax on on-going construction projects from July 2006 to September 2009. It was held that the demand prior to 1.6.2007, falling under works contract service, could not be sustained. The Tribunal found that the contractor had already paid the service tax, absolving the appellant, a developer/promoter, from liability. The decision emphasized the distinction in service tax liability between developer/promoter and contractor, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. en-us Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:13:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364081 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the demand for service tax on on-going construction projects from July 2006 to September 2009. It was held that the demand prior to 1.6.2007, falling under works contract service, could not be sustained. The Tribunal found that the contractor had already paid the service tax, absolving the appellant, a developer/promoter, from liability. The decision emphasized the distinction in service tax liability between developer/promoter and contractor, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364081