<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1382 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that no Service Tax was payable for the in-house fabrication work, considering the nature of the agreement between the parties and the basis of payment for the services provided. The appeal by Revenue challenging the respondent&#039;s liability to pay Service Tax under &#039;Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service&#039; for in-house fabrication work was rejected. The absence of a written contract, payments based on the weight of goods manufactured, and the use of materials and machinery of M/s Alpha Services were key factors in determining that the arrangement did not constitute supply of manpower.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:12:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1382 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that no Service Tax was payable for the in-house fabrication work, considering the nature of the agreement between the parties and the basis of payment for the services provided. The appeal by Revenue challenging the respondent&#039;s liability to pay Service Tax under &#039;Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service&#039; for in-house fabrication work was rejected. The absence of a written contract, payments based on the weight of goods manufactured, and the use of materials and machinery of M/s Alpha Services were key factors in determining that the arrangement did not constitute supply of manpower.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>