<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364069</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellant, liable to pay service tax on GTA services, failed to establish payment to transporters. The extended limitation period was deemed inapplicable due to lack of evidence of intent to evade duty. As the appellant paid service tax on a reverse charge basis without mala fide intent, penalties were not applicable. The case was remanded for quantifying the demand within the limitation period, disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364069</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellant, liable to pay service tax on GTA services, failed to establish payment to transporters. The extended limitation period was deemed inapplicable due to lack of evidence of intent to evade duty. As the appellant paid service tax on a reverse charge basis without mala fide intent, penalties were not applicable. The case was remanded for quantifying the demand within the limitation period, disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>