<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1372 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364064</link>
    <description>Services rendered to a recipient outside India, with consideration received in convertible foreign exchange, were treated as export of service and not liable to service tax under the alleged management consultancy classification. The services were advisory in nature and fell within the relevant CBEC circular on export of service. On that basis, the tax demand and penalty were unsustainable, and the revenue appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1372 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364064</link>
      <description>Services rendered to a recipient outside India, with consideration received in convertible foreign exchange, were treated as export of service and not liable to service tax under the alleged management consultancy classification. The services were advisory in nature and fell within the relevant CBEC circular on export of service. On that basis, the tax demand and penalty were unsustainable, and the revenue appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>