<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 72 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13785</link>
    <description>An ancestral family estate that had descended for generations was held to be impartible by custom, not a fresh Crown-grant estate, so family property could be impressed with impartibility; this point was decided for the Revenue. After abolition of the Istimrari estate, however, the statutory resumption vested the estate in the State and removed the basis of succession by primogeniture, while section 4 of the Hindu Succession Act displaced any inconsistent custom or prior law. The retained immovable properties and business therefore lost their impartible character and were assessable as Hindu undivided family property, not as the holder&#039;s individual income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:53:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 72 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13785</link>
      <description>An ancestral family estate that had descended for generations was held to be impartible by custom, not a fresh Crown-grant estate, so family property could be impressed with impartibility; this point was decided for the Revenue. After abolition of the Istimrari estate, however, the statutory resumption vested the estate in the State and removed the basis of succession by primogeniture, while section 4 of the Hindu Succession Act displaced any inconsistent custom or prior law. The retained immovable properties and business therefore lost their impartible character and were assessable as Hindu undivided family property, not as the holder&#039;s individual income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>