<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1359 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate excess stock of finished goods and impose penalties on the appellant company and its Director. The penalties were reduced to the Central Excise duty on the excess stock, and the demand for duty was upheld due to unrecorded stock clearance without payment. The Tribunal reduced one penalty to 50,000 but rejected the appeal against the duty demand. The decision was made on 27.03.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:11:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1359 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate excess stock of finished goods and impose penalties on the appellant company and its Director. The penalties were reduced to the Central Excise duty on the excess stock, and the demand for duty was upheld due to unrecorded stock clearance without payment. The Tribunal reduced one penalty to 50,000 but rejected the appeal against the duty demand. The decision was made on 27.03.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>