<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1354 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364046</link>
    <description>The court found that the recovery notice against a deceased person was not legally sustainable due to unresolved issues from a previous writ petition challenging the assessment order. The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order, but granted the respondent the option to proceed lawfully if necessary. No costs were awarded, and the related petitions were closed following the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:11:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1354 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364046</link>
      <description>The court found that the recovery notice against a deceased person was not legally sustainable due to unresolved issues from a previous writ petition challenging the assessment order. The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order, but granted the respondent the option to proceed lawfully if necessary. No costs were awarded, and the related petitions were closed following the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>