<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1345 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364037</link>
    <description>Special leave petition was dismissed for low tax effect, and the Supreme Court expressly left the question of law open. Delay was condoned, but no substantive legal issue was decided on merits. The order therefore reflects a tax litigation disposal based on the revenue threshold rather than adjudication of the underlying legal controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 16:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1345 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364037</link>
      <description>Special leave petition was dismissed for low tax effect, and the Supreme Court expressly left the question of law open. Delay was condoned, but no substantive legal issue was decided on merits. The order therefore reflects a tax litigation disposal based on the revenue threshold rather than adjudication of the underlying legal controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>