<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1189 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273977</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that Unit II and Unit III were independent units entitled to benefits under Section 10A of the Act. The reassessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 2004-2005 were deemed invalid, and the judgments of the lower authorities were set aside, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 16:07:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1189 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273977</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that Unit II and Unit III were independent units entitled to benefits under Section 10A of the Act. The reassessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 2004-2005 were deemed invalid, and the judgments of the lower authorities were set aside, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>