<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 1010 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGLORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273971</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a PMLA show cause notice on alleged non-recording and non-communication of reasons was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal lay to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 26, with further appeal under Section 42 available against any adverse tribunal order. The Court also held that non-furnishing of certified copies, order sheets, or other records did not warrant quashing of the notice, since those grievances could be addressed through certified-copy requests and inspection of records under the prescribed procedure. The petition was disposed of without interference, leaving the petitioner to pursue statutory and procedural remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 16:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 1010 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGLORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273971</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a PMLA show cause notice on alleged non-recording and non-communication of reasons was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal lay to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 26, with further appeal under Section 42 available against any adverse tribunal order. The Court also held that non-furnishing of certified copies, order sheets, or other records did not warrant quashing of the notice, since those grievances could be addressed through certified-copy requests and inspection of records under the prescribed procedure. The petition was disposed of without interference, leaving the petitioner to pursue statutory and procedural remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>