<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1187 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273975</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It was held that the respondent did not suppress information to evade tax, and the extended limitation period was wrongly invoked. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, concluding that there was no suppression or evasion of duty, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1187 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273975</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It was held that the respondent did not suppress information to evade tax, and the extended limitation period was wrongly invoked. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, concluding that there was no suppression or evasion of duty, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>