<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1322 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364014</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, directing the Principal Commissioner to reconsider the Revision Application after condoning the delay, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present its case on merits. The Court emphasized the broad revisional powers under Section 264 and the importance of following principles of natural justice in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1322 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364014</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, directing the Principal Commissioner to reconsider the Revision Application after condoning the delay, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present its case on merits. The Court emphasized the broad revisional powers under Section 264 and the importance of following principles of natural justice in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>