<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1313 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the unexplained credit claimed as a loan from Sh. Barinder Pal Singh. The decision emphasized the necessity of genuine sources of funds and the need for substantial evidence to substantiate such claims to prevent penalties based on probabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1313 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the unexplained credit claimed as a loan from Sh. Barinder Pal Singh. The decision emphasized the necessity of genuine sources of funds and the need for substantial evidence to substantiate such claims to prevent penalties based on probabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>