<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 271 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13772</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case challenging the discounting of apparent consideration and retention of transfer fee amount by the respondents. The court held that the discounted value should be calculated from the agreement date, rendering the previous view obsolete. It was determined that unascertained amounts like transfer fees could not be deducted from consideration. The court directed the respondents to refund the transfer fee amount to the petitioner with interest within eight weeks, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 271 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13772</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case challenging the discounting of apparent consideration and retention of transfer fee amount by the respondents. The court held that the discounted value should be calculated from the agreement date, rendering the previous view obsolete. It was determined that unascertained amounts like transfer fees could not be deducted from consideration. The court directed the respondents to refund the transfer fee amount to the petitioner with interest within eight weeks, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>