<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1300 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of imported insecticides due to contravention of registration requirements and improper importation under the Insecticides Act. The penalty was reduced but imposed within statutory limits. The judgment clarified the distinction between import for use in India and for further manufacture, emphasizing compliance with registration and import conditions under the Act and Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1300 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of imported insecticides due to contravention of registration requirements and improper importation under the Insecticides Act. The penalty was reduced but imposed within statutory limits. The judgment clarified the distinction between import for use in India and for further manufacture, emphasizing compliance with registration and import conditions under the Act and Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>