<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1299 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Department&#039;s decision on assessable value determination and penalties, ruling in favor of the appellant due to lack of evidence to reject the transaction value and improper application of valuation rules. The judgment emphasized the importance of following sequential valuation rules and requiring concrete evidence before enhancing value, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:37:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1299 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Department&#039;s decision on assessable value determination and penalties, ruling in favor of the appellant due to lack of evidence to reject the transaction value and improper application of valuation rules. The judgment emphasized the importance of following sequential valuation rules and requiring concrete evidence before enhancing value, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>