https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363989 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order dropping the demand of Rs. 1,81,11,759, citing that the show-cause notice was premature as the Development Commissioner had not made adverse findings. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Circulars by CBEC, stating violations should be resolved by the Commissioner before confirming any demand. As no communication was received regarding the demand against the appellant, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Mar 2020 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363989 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order dropping the demand of Rs. 1,81,11,759, citing that the show-cause notice was premature as the Development Commissioner had not made adverse findings. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Circulars by CBEC, stating violations should be resolved by the Commissioner before confirming any demand. As no communication was received regarding the demand against the appellant, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363989