https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363982 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, a society providing training to banks, on the taxability of services under "Commercial Coaching or Training." The demand for duty, interest, and penalties was set aside due to the time-barred nature of the demand beyond the normal period. The Tribunal upheld the cum-duty benefit for the appellant, rejecting the Revenue's argument against it. The case involved considerations of mutuality of interest, binding nature of decisions, and re-quantification of demand falling within the limitation period. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:36:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363982 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, a society providing training to banks, on the taxability of services under "Commercial Coaching or Training." The demand for duty, interest, and penalties was set aside due to the time-barred nature of the demand beyond the normal period. The Tribunal upheld the cum-duty benefit for the appellant, rejecting the Revenue's argument against it. The case involved considerations of mutuality of interest, binding nature of decisions, and re-quantification of demand falling within the limitation period. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363982