https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363970 The Tribunal confirmed duty liability against the proprietor of M/s Taj Products for clandestine manufacture of Pan Masala, starting from January 2011 instead of April 2010 based on evidence presented, despite Rule 17(2) provisions. Penalty was imposed on the manufacturer, while the brand owner was exempted due to lack of involvement evidence. The case was remanded for quantification of duty liability and penalty imposition based on the actual manufacturing period. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:36:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363970 The Tribunal confirmed duty liability against the proprietor of M/s Taj Products for clandestine manufacture of Pan Masala, starting from January 2011 instead of April 2010 based on evidence presented, despite Rule 17(2) provisions. Penalty was imposed on the manufacturer, while the brand owner was exempted due to lack of involvement evidence. The case was remanded for quantification of duty liability and penalty imposition based on the actual manufacturing period. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363970