https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363964 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) Order-in-Appeal, allowing the appeals of the manufacturer appellant and its ex-partner. The decision was based on the lack of corroborating evidence to support the confessional statement, emphasizing the necessity for thorough investigation and proof to establish duty liability. The Tribunal stressed the importance of substantiating liability with material evidence, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal principles in excise matters. en-us Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:35:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363964 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) Order-in-Appeal, allowing the appeals of the manufacturer appellant and its ex-partner. The decision was based on the lack of corroborating evidence to support the confessional statement, emphasizing the necessity for thorough investigation and proof to establish duty liability. The Tribunal stressed the importance of substantiating liability with material evidence, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal principles in excise matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363964