https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273941 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 209-A and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, as the appellant was not dealing with goods subject to confiscation. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, highlighting the absence of goods liable for confiscation, which is a prerequisite for imposing such penalties. en-us Tue, 01 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:34:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273941 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 209-A and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, as the appellant was not dealing with goods subject to confiscation. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, highlighting the absence of goods liable for confiscation, which is a prerequisite for imposing such penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273941