<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1599 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that transportation charges for coal within the mining area should be classified under Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services, not mining services. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions and settled law on identical facts, determining that the transport of coal from pit head to railway siding falls under GTA services. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Revenue&#039;s orders and allowed the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1599 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that transportation charges for coal within the mining area should be classified under Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services, not mining services. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions and settled law on identical facts, determining that the transport of coal from pit head to railway siding falls under GTA services. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Revenue&#039;s orders and allowed the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>