<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1683 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the service tax demand for providing promotion of sales services to principals outside India. Relying on precedents and the interpretation that payments made to the appellant can be deemed as in foreign exchange, the Tribunal concluded that the service rendered qualifies as export of service. The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable and decided to follow the ratio laid down in previous judgments, ultimately allowing the appeal and bringing a favorable conclusion for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1683 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the service tax demand for providing promotion of sales services to principals outside India. Relying on precedents and the interpretation that payments made to the appellant can be deemed as in foreign exchange, the Tribunal concluded that the service rendered qualifies as export of service. The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable and decided to follow the ratio laid down in previous judgments, ultimately allowing the appeal and bringing a favorable conclusion for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>