<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1185 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273953</link>
    <description>No substantial question of law arose where the disputed issue had already been decided against the Revenue in the assessee&#039;s own case for an earlier assessment year. The HC noted counsel&#039;s concession that the same point had been dismissed in the prior appeal and, in light of that binding prior determination, declined to entertain the present appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1185 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273953</link>
      <description>No substantial question of law arose where the disputed issue had already been decided against the Revenue in the assessee&#039;s own case for an earlier assessment year. The HC noted counsel&#039;s concession that the same point had been dismissed in the prior appeal and, in light of that binding prior determination, declined to entertain the present appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>