https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273938 The Commission found the bank's response lacking in transparency and misinterpretation of the RTI Act provisions. It directed the bank to provide the requested information and access to relevant files within 15 working days, emphasizing the absence of legal grounds for withholding the investigation report. The CPIO was ordered to show cause for potential penalty under Section 20(1) of the Act for non-compliance. A hearing was scheduled for the CPIO to explain the failure to adhere to the Act's provisions, ultimately disposing of the appeal. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:33:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273938 The Commission found the bank's response lacking in transparency and misinterpretation of the RTI Act provisions. It directed the bank to provide the requested information and access to relevant files within 15 working days, emphasizing the absence of legal grounds for withholding the investigation report. The CPIO was ordered to show cause for potential penalty under Section 20(1) of the Act for non-compliance. A hearing was scheduled for the CPIO to explain the failure to adhere to the Act's provisions, ultimately disposing of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273938