<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 136 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13762</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the ITAT&#039;s order, which annulled the assessment made by the AO, due to procedural impropriety. The Tribunal had improperly allowed the assessee to raise additional grounds without remanding the case to the CIT(A). The HC directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the appeal, including the new grounds, within six months, ensuring compliance with legal standards. No costs were awarded, and parties were instructed to appear on a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 136 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13762</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the ITAT&#039;s order, which annulled the assessment made by the AO, due to procedural impropriety. The Tribunal had improperly allowed the assessee to raise additional grounds without remanding the case to the CIT(A). The HC directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the appeal, including the new grounds, within six months, ensuring compliance with legal standards. No costs were awarded, and parties were instructed to appear on a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>