<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1227 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363919</link>
    <description>The case involved a Pvt. Ltd. Co. importing &#039;Chalk-Natural Calcium Carbonate&#039; facing classification issues under the Customs Tariff. Discrepancies in test reports by CRCL led to a legal battle for retesting at an NABL accredited lab. The High Court directed retesting at a lab other than CRCL, emphasizing the need for finalizing assessments before enforcing bank guarantees. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper testing procedures and compliance with established guidelines. Ultimately, the court decision favored retesting at a suitable lab and underscored the significance of accurate testing and fair assessment finalization in resolving import-related disputes effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1227 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363919</link>
      <description>The case involved a Pvt. Ltd. Co. importing &#039;Chalk-Natural Calcium Carbonate&#039; facing classification issues under the Customs Tariff. Discrepancies in test reports by CRCL led to a legal battle for retesting at an NABL accredited lab. The High Court directed retesting at a lab other than CRCL, emphasizing the need for finalizing assessments before enforcing bank guarantees. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper testing procedures and compliance with established guidelines. Ultimately, the court decision favored retesting at a suitable lab and underscored the significance of accurate testing and fair assessment finalization in resolving import-related disputes effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>