<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1226 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reject the enhanced assessable value of imported goods, emphasizing the requirement for detailed inquiries and material evidence to establish undervaluation under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no merit in Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Order-in-Appeal and disposing of the stay applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1226 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reject the enhanced assessable value of imported goods, emphasizing the requirement for detailed inquiries and material evidence to establish undervaluation under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no merit in Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Order-in-Appeal and disposing of the stay applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>