<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1225 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the penalties imposed, as there was no legal proof of smuggling, and the case was based on assumptions. The judgment emphasized that suspicion, however strong, cannot replace legal proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1225 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the penalties imposed, as there was no legal proof of smuggling, and the case was based on assumptions. The judgment emphasized that suspicion, however strong, cannot replace legal proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>