https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363915 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and quashing the provisional attachment order. It found that the Adjudicating Authority failed to provide clear findings on whether the disputed amount was proceeds of crime and violated principles of natural justice. Additionally, there was no evidence indicating the appellant's involvement in money laundering or knowingly receiving proceeds of crime. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of a direct link between the appellant and the accused, ultimately leading to the decision to quash the provisional attachment order. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:45:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363915 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and quashing the provisional attachment order. It found that the Adjudicating Authority failed to provide clear findings on whether the disputed amount was proceeds of crime and violated principles of natural justice. Additionally, there was no evidence indicating the appellant's involvement in money laundering or knowingly receiving proceeds of crime. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of a direct link between the appellant and the accused, ultimately leading to the decision to quash the provisional attachment order. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363915