<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1222 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Respondent in contempt for transferring equity shares despite a status quo order, directing re-transfer to the Appellant. Emphasizing compliance with court orders, the Tribunal highlighted the duty to rectify violations to uphold the rule of law and public trust in the judiciary. The decision focused on the specific appeal, with pending petitions resolved, and set the main appeal for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:45:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1222 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Respondent in contempt for transferring equity shares despite a status quo order, directing re-transfer to the Appellant. Emphasizing compliance with court orders, the Tribunal highlighted the duty to rectify violations to uphold the rule of law and public trust in the judiciary. The decision focused on the specific appeal, with pending petitions resolved, and set the main appeal for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>