https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363913 The Commission held that non-disclosure of information based on sub-judice status without a specific court order is legally unjustifiable under the RTI Act. Emphasizing transparency, it criticized the CPIO and Bank Chief Manager for misinterpreting provisions. The Commission directed the CPIO and FAA to provide the requested information promptly, highlighting the importance of compliance with the RTI Act. The FAA was reprimanded for not adhering to RTI Act provisions and advised to be vigilant in future implementations. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363913 The Commission held that non-disclosure of information based on sub-judice status without a specific court order is legally unjustifiable under the RTI Act. Emphasizing transparency, it criticized the CPIO and Bank Chief Manager for misinterpreting provisions. The Commission directed the CPIO and FAA to provide the requested information promptly, highlighting the importance of compliance with the RTI Act. The FAA was reprimanded for not adhering to RTI Act provisions and advised to be vigilant in future implementations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363913