<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 103 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13755</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed the appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The court found the arguments presented lacked merit and were primarily focused on factual discrepancies rather than legal issues. Consequently, the court declined to entertain the appeal and dismissed it summarily, emphasizing that not every question qualifies as a substantial question of law warranting court intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:20:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 103 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13755</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed the appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The court found the arguments presented lacked merit and were primarily focused on factual discrepancies rather than legal issues. Consequently, the court declined to entertain the appeal and dismissed it summarily, emphasizing that not every question qualifies as a substantial question of law warranting court intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>