https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363884 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess molasses and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal. The appellant, a Sugar & Molasses producer, successfully refuted the accusations by highlighting the State Excise Department's control over molasses custody and measurement variations. The Tribunal found no evidence of clandestine removal, emphasizing the lack of specific allegations in the Show Cause Notice. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:43:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363884 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess molasses and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal. The appellant, a Sugar & Molasses producer, successfully refuted the accusations by highlighting the State Excise Department's control over molasses custody and measurement variations. The Tribunal found no evidence of clandestine removal, emphasizing the lack of specific allegations in the Show Cause Notice. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363884