https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363882 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's refund claim under the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008, for a closure period, holding that continuous closure days, even across different months, constitute one continuous period for abatement determination. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's rejection, deeming it erroneous, and granted the refund for the specified period. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to process the refund with interest within 30 days. en-us Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:43:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363882 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's refund claim under the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008, for a closure period, holding that continuous closure days, even across different months, constitute one continuous period for abatement determination. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's rejection, deeming it erroneous, and granted the refund for the specified period. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to process the refund with interest within 30 days. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363882