<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1422 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273925</link>
    <description>Binding precedent governed the questions raised in the appeal, and the appellants conceded that earlier decisions of the same Court had already answered those issues against them. The Court treated those prior rulings as dispositive of the controversy and declined to examine the matter further. The appeal was therefore dismissed because the claimed relief could not survive in the face of settled law already applied to the same questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1422 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273925</link>
      <description>Binding precedent governed the questions raised in the appeal, and the appellants conceded that earlier decisions of the same Court had already answered those issues against them. The Court treated those prior rulings as dispositive of the controversy and declined to examine the matter further. The appeal was therefore dismissed because the claimed relief could not survive in the face of settled law already applied to the same questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>