<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1423 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273926</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Tax Appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s judgment, which deleted expenditure disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The Court applied the explanation to section 40(a)(ia) retrospectively, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the belated deposit of tax deducted at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1423 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273926</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Tax Appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s judgment, which deleted expenditure disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The Court applied the explanation to section 40(a)(ia) retrospectively, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the belated deposit of tax deducted at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>