<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1666 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273931</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal in line with the precedent set in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. (2012), where the same question was resolved against the appellants. The appellants were represented by Sri E. I. Sanmathi, Advocate, while the respondent had no representation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1666 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273931</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal in line with the precedent set in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. (2012), where the same question was resolved against the appellants. The appellants were represented by Sri E. I. Sanmathi, Advocate, while the respondent had no representation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>