<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1665 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to quash the penalties imposed under sections 271D and 271E for the assessment year 2005-06. The penalties were found to be erroneous and invalid as they related to transactions from different assessment years, emphasizing that penalties should align with the facts of the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1665 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to quash the penalties imposed under sections 271D and 271E for the assessment year 2005-06. The penalties were found to be erroneous and invalid as they related to transactions from different assessment years, emphasizing that penalties should align with the facts of the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>