<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1159 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to tax the principal portion of lease rentals as income, dismissing appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that if depreciation was claimed, full lease rentals had to be shown as income, irrespective of Accounting Standards. The decision was rendered on December 20, 2012, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1159 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to tax the principal portion of lease rentals as income, dismissing appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that if depreciation was claimed, full lease rentals had to be shown as income, irrespective of Accounting Standards. The decision was rendered on December 20, 2012, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>