<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1166 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363858</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the ITAT as the assessee trust was found eligible to claim depreciation on a fixed asset, despite the entire cost being claimed as application of income in previous years under section 11 of the Act. The ITAT relied on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision that depreciation could be claimed in such cases. The judgment emphasized that granting depreciation did not amount to a double benefit and discussed the inapplicability of section 11(6) for the relevant year. The decision highlighted legal principles regarding depreciation for charitable institutions, citing precedents from the Supreme Court and Bombay High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:09:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1166 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363858</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the ITAT as the assessee trust was found eligible to claim depreciation on a fixed asset, despite the entire cost being claimed as application of income in previous years under section 11 of the Act. The ITAT relied on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision that depreciation could be claimed in such cases. The judgment emphasized that granting depreciation did not amount to a double benefit and discussed the inapplicability of section 11(6) for the relevant year. The decision highlighted legal principles regarding depreciation for charitable institutions, citing precedents from the Supreme Court and Bombay High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>