https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363829 A liberty granted in an arbitral award to seek reconsideration did not amount to setting aside termination of a dealership or directing restoration of supply; the award and the order affirming it were limited to that effect. The Corporation's later rejection of the dealer's representation was an independent administrative decision, and in the absence of arbitrariness the High Court could not, in writ jurisdiction, substitute its own view or compel restoration of the dealership. The Division Bench's order was therefore set aside and the Single Judge's dismissal of the writ petition restored. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jul 2018 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363829 A liberty granted in an arbitral award to seek reconsideration did not amount to setting aside termination of a dealership or directing restoration of supply; the award and the order affirming it were limited to that effect. The Corporation's later rejection of the dealer's representation was an independent administrative decision, and in the absence of arbitrariness the High Court could not, in writ jurisdiction, substitute its own view or compel restoration of the dealership. The Division Bench's order was therefore set aside and the Single Judge's dismissal of the writ petition restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363829