<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1134 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363826</link>
    <description>The Court modified CESTAT&#039;s order mandating a 10% pre-deposit of interest amount, reducing it to 7.5% of the demand within 4 weeks. The petitioner&#039;s appeal, initially dismissed for non-compliance, was reinstated for a hearing on merits upon deposit. The CESTAT was directed to ensure the pre-deposit before proceeding with the appeal. All parties&#039; rights were preserved, and the petition was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1134 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363826</link>
      <description>The Court modified CESTAT&#039;s order mandating a 10% pre-deposit of interest amount, reducing it to 7.5% of the demand within 4 weeks. The petitioner&#039;s appeal, initially dismissed for non-compliance, was reinstated for a hearing on merits upon deposit. The CESTAT was directed to ensure the pre-deposit before proceeding with the appeal. All parties&#039; rights were preserved, and the petition was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>