https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363803 Central excise duty demand could not be sustained where the cleared goods were not shown to be goods manufactured by the appellant. On the admitted facts, the clearances did not match the basis on which the demand was raised, and in the absence of manufacture of the goods in question, the duty liability failed. The demand was therefore held untenable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the appellant. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:00:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363803 Central excise duty demand could not be sustained where the cleared goods were not shown to be goods manufactured by the appellant. On the admitted facts, the clearances did not match the basis on which the demand was raised, and in the absence of manufacture of the goods in question, the duty liability failed. The demand was therefore held untenable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363803