<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1595 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273888</link>
    <description>The court decided most issues in favor of the assessee, except for the expense provision written back, which was decided in favor of the Department. The court emphasized the importance of a direct nexus between the incidental incomes and the business of the undertaking while interpreting Section 80IA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 05:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1595 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273888</link>
      <description>The court decided most issues in favor of the assessee, except for the expense provision written back, which was decided in favor of the Department. The court emphasized the importance of a direct nexus between the incidental incomes and the business of the undertaking while interpreting Section 80IA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>