<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1177 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273891</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal brought by the Revenue against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment. The Court found no question of law arising from the transactions of purchase and sale of land, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that capital gains should apply. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the taxation of consideration received by the respondent-assessee as a partner of two firms, emphasizing the potential for double taxation if partners were taxed individually for transactions deemed sham. The Court concluded that no legal questions warranted further consideration, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 05:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1177 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273891</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal brought by the Revenue against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment. The Court found no question of law arising from the transactions of purchase and sale of land, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that capital gains should apply. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the taxation of consideration received by the respondent-assessee as a partner of two firms, emphasizing the potential for double taxation if partners were taxed individually for transactions deemed sham. The Court concluded that no legal questions warranted further consideration, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>