<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1688 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273895</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the addition of late deposits of PF, ESI, and professional tax for AY 2013-14. The Court found that the payments were made before the due date, following precedent set in Commissioner of Income Tax v. AIMIL Ltd. The Court declined to reconsider this decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 05:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1688 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273895</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the addition of late deposits of PF, ESI, and professional tax for AY 2013-14. The Court found that the payments were made before the due date, following precedent set in Commissioner of Income Tax v. AIMIL Ltd. The Court declined to reconsider this decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>