<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1419 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273873</link>
    <description>Interest earned on deposits of advances received for a project was examined in light of a memorandum of understanding requiring the interest to form part of project cost. The Tribunal&#039;s view that taxability depended on the agreed treatment of the funds, rather than any later use, was upheld as consistent with the arrangement and free from legal infirmity. The Revenue was unable to show any substantial question of law arising from the order, so the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1419 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273873</link>
      <description>Interest earned on deposits of advances received for a project was examined in light of a memorandum of understanding requiring the interest to form part of project cost. The Tribunal&#039;s view that taxability depended on the agreed treatment of the funds, rather than any later use, was upheld as consistent with the arrangement and free from legal infirmity. The Revenue was unable to show any substantial question of law arising from the order, so the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>