<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1091 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the addition of Rs. 90,19,000 as Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) and allowed the full claim of Rs. 2,93,656 as interest on housing loan under Section 24(b). The challenge to the initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed as premature, and the general ground of appeal was also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1091 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the addition of Rs. 90,19,000 as Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) and allowed the full claim of Rs. 2,93,656 as interest on housing loan under Section 24(b). The challenge to the initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed as premature, and the general ground of appeal was also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>